Enclosure No. 2,
THE IMMIGRANTS CONTROL ORDINANCE, 1949.
2&2
Explanatory observations in accordance with Article XXVIII
of the Royal Instructions.
1.
This Ordinance was passed with four amendments on
the 20th January, 1949.
2. The reasons for enacting this Ordinance are set out
in the Objects and Reasons to the Bill, A copy of such Bill
is attached upon which are indicated such amendments which
were effected at the Committee stage.
3. The principal amendment so effected concerned
Clause 11(5) of the Bill which on my motion at the Committee
stage was amended to make clear that penalty upon a master
owner or agent will require conviction by a Magistrate and
not be automatic upon the conviction of a person for entry
without permission and to make clear that a conviction of a
master owner or agent will not result where he can satisfy the
Magistrate that an illegal entry was not due to the act or
default of any such master, owner or agent.
40
The Bill passed through Legislative Council without
debate. It received considerable attention in the press.
Criticism was favourable except in so far that the English
language press were averse to the employment of Section 34 (f)
General
to exempt persons of Chinese race from compliance with the
ん
Ordinance. The intention that such exemption (according with
existing practice) would be given was made known by ine oa
introduction of the Bill. It will be appreciated that exemption
must necessarily be made and continued in force until such
time as necessity for control of entry of persons of Chinese
race is absolute and capacity to enforce such control effectively
is afforded.
7. 18. Michen
Attorney General.
HONG KONG,
TM. 1919
Page 210Page 211
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.